
\begin{table}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{3.5} D{.}{.}{3.5} D{.}{.}{3.5} D{.}{.}{3.5}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{External Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Satisfaction with Democracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Internal Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Political Interest} \\
\midrule
Group 2                 & 0.08       & -0.04      & 0.13       & 0.11       \\
                        & (0.11)     & (0.09)     & (0.13)     & (0.10)     \\
Wave 2                  & 0.05       & 0.08       & 0.16       & 0.12       \\
                        & (0.10)     & (0.09)     & (0.12)     & (0.10)     \\
Group 2 $\times$ Wave 2 & -0.23      & -0.24^{*}  & -0.08      & -0.05      \\
                        & (0.15)     & (0.13)     & (0.18)     & (0.15)     \\
(Intercept)             & 2.96^{***} & 3.73^{***} & 3.18^{***} & 3.34^{***} \\
                        & (0.07)     & (0.06)     & (0.08)     & (0.07)     \\
\midrule
R$^2$                   & 0.00       & 0.01       & 0.00       & 0.00       \\
N                       & 691        & 695        & 690        & 697        \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{l}{\tiny{\footnotesize $^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\end{small}
\caption{The effect of losing eligibility. Presented estimates capture the results from DiD-specifications comparing groups 1 and 2 across waves1 and 2. Based on a birthdates sample with bandwidth 100.}
\label{table:coefficients}
\end{center}
\end{table}
